Welcome to the Gilded Teachers League!

The Gilded Teachers League is a free, virtual program for middle and high school social studies teachers looking to dive deeper into civic education topics. Our teacher-centric program aims to connect participating educators to our collections and promote the use of primary sources in the classroom. Gilded Teachers gain access to yearly resource guides that feature links to primary and secondary source recommendations curated by Hayes Presidential’s Curatorial & Education Department as well as a social media page dedicated to networking and collaborating within the group. Teachers can use these sources to design new and engaging lessons to be used in their classrooms. Hayes Presidential will host a series of available zoom sessions offering teachers a chance to share their current work and gain support from peers and public history professionals working in the field. Any teacher created materials (units, lessons plans, educational tools etc…) can be submitted for review to be posted to our “Teacher’s Corner,” a webpage with resources made by teachers for teachers. By joining the Gilded Teachers League, educators not only gain access to select collections but also join a community of support and resources aimed at engaging with the past in a way that enables further conversation in the present.

Interested in joining the Gilded Teachers League? APPLY HERE!

For more information on the Gilded Teachers League, including new resource guides and tentative zoom schedule, please read below:

RESOURCE GUIDES:

The Gilded Teachers League has access to new resource guide(s) created each year by HPLM staff that are all centered around a theme.  The theme for this year is “The Election of 1876." Each resource guide highlights a key topic of that theme and features primary sources from HPLM collections, Library of Congress, Newspapers.com, and HarpWeek.com as well as suggestions for secondary sources. These sources are organized by source type and grade level (6-8, 9-12, and CCP) with ATOS scores provided next to each textual source for a general idea of reading comprehension levels. Each source is hyperlinked for easy access to digital scans and transcriptions of sources on their host website. Find our resource guides for 2025 below!

 

Political campaigns during the 19th century differed greatly from modern campaigns. Before the 20th century, candidates were not expected to publicly campaign for themselves. In fact, to do so would have been seen as an inappropriate act. The office was meant to seek the candidate and not the other way around. However, there were many individuals within the party who would campaign for their party’s candidate. During the election of 1876, campaigns included published political cartoons, speeches, and pamphlets in newspapers alongside public gatherings and night parades lit by torchlight. Campaigns also had a variety of materials they distributed to spread their message like buttons, ribbons, paper lanterns, and songs. Below are a selection of manuscripts and artifacts that showcase the 1876 campaign, including those already mentioned and more like celebrity endorsements from Mark Twain and a behind-the-scenes look at the candidate’s inner thoughts through a collection of letters and diary entries from Rutherford B. Hayes.

Exactly 100 years after the founding of our country and following the passing of the 14th and 15th Amendments, the election of 1876 presents us with a unique snapshot of voting rights in U.S. history. Not only did it demonstrate the work being done to expand suffrage to disenfranchised groups, but it also revealed that the right to vote did not guarantee the ability to vote in U.S. elections. Following election day in 1876, reports of fraud, intimidation, and violence against black men in the South to persuade and prevent their votes all together were rampant. This fraud and intimidation became the central focus of canvassing boards in Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana, who were still under incumbent Republican leadership. Below is a collection of resources that explore the topic of voting rights in 1876, including voting charts, newspaper reports, and personal testimonies. There is also a selection of sources dedicated to the cipher dispatches that played a role in additional fraud following election day, as party officials plotted to intervene by purchasing entire canvassing boards and individual electors through coded telegrams. This time-period also saw the start of Jim Crow throughout the South, making for an interesting case study into the complex and non-linear history of voting rights in the U.S. while opening discussions around voting rights today.

There was no clear winner following election night in 1876. Conflicting reports from various states made it impossible to determine a clear winner and evidence of voter fraud, intimidation, and violence against black voters in the South challenged the election’s integrity. After both Democrats and Republicans from Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Oregon submitted their own slate of electors in December of 1876, Congress was sent into an electoral crisis. Who could determine which electors were the real electors? The 1876 electoral crisis, commission, and controversy presents a unique opportunity to examine the electoral college, including its characteristics and functions alongside its potential shortcomings. It also provides insight into the way Congress works to resolve conflicts as they arise in our country. Below are a collection of sources investigating this crisis in varying levels of detail and using diverse source types including an electoral college map, political cartoons, news articles, and official congressional records from this time. While the sources include reports from all four states, this resource guide uses Oregon as a case study since it focused on the legitimacy of a single elector John W. Watts, and as such, serves as a good introduction to the basics of the electoral college.

While candidates were expected to remain civil towards their opponents and distant from their own campaigns, the media was not. By the 1876 election, newspapers featured journalistic opinions and attention-grabbing headlines to capture their specific audiences’ attention. In fact, newspapers were often known to be either a “Republican” or “Democratic” newspaper. As such, media coverage of the 1876 election presents us with the opportunity to learn the unfolding of events as individuals from that time would have learned. The media coverage featured below includes political cartoons, bold headlines, and political articles that revealed the varied opinions and stories being relayed to the public during the electoral crisis and following controversy. Most headlines and articles are features from The Sun (a Democratic paper in New York, NY), The Chicago Tribune (a Republican paper from Chicago, IL), and The Courier- Journal (a Democratic paper from Louisville, KY). While HPLM has most of these newspapers in either physical or microfilm format, the scans used in this collection were clipped from the digital scans on Newspapers.com. We do suggest following a timeline provided here by Harpweek to help track the events being reported on and reacted to by these newspapers.

Gilded Teachers can explore each resource guide and select the sources that interest them the most to use in their classrooms, working either independently or collaboratively to design their educational resources. Teachers will be able to share and reflect on their current work through the Gilded Teachers League social media page and optional Zoom sessions hosted by HPLM staff. These Zoom sessions offer teachers an opportunity to gain support from one another as well as public history professionals, including Hayes Presidential’s Curator of Manuscripts, Curator of Artifacts, and Historian. Created resources may be submitted for review to our “Teacher’s Corner” expanding their accessibility for teachers across the country.

Tentative 2025 Spring Zooms Sessions

  • March
  • April
  • May